أكاذيب مافيات الطب والانترنت عن MMS Wikipedia Lies
If you haven’t used Wikipedia (an online encyclopedia) lately, you might not
know that anyone can write data into the information found there. Unfortunately
that encourages many people to promote their own favorite phobias and hatreds
that they have developed without evidence. In the case of MMS, it has always
been without evidence because there is nothing that backs up the lies. There is
no evidence anywhere showing that MMS does damage.
Another bad part about Wikipedia is that anyone can also erase anything that
someone else writes. In this way Wikipedia encourages hundreds of demented and
stupid psychopaths to push their ideas and beliefs on the rest of us. The
psychopaths work in groups of at least 4 individuals.
·
They watch and guard their writings and the minute anyone comes by and tries to
write the facts, a psychopath immediately erases them and restores his or her
own lies.
This is done on Wikipedia so that the lies remain in place and any posting of
facts is erased within 10 minutes. We can’t compete with them as they seem to be
willing to stay on the job 24 hours a day.
Thus, for
almost two years, Wikipedia has erased all facts concerning MMS and added lies
each time someone tried to tell the truth. Worse than that,
·
Everywhere in Wikipedia where there is a mention of chlorine dioxide or sodium
chlorite, or even sodium chlorate, they have included an additional lie about
MMS.
Do you realize the implication of this? It means that probably thousands of
people have continued to suffer and even die when MMS could have helped them,
because these few demented psychopaths have continued to lie and to force their
superstition on the rest of humanity. They do it without knowing the chemistry
of MMS or even trying to learn it, and without being willing to look at what MMS
is doing. They
also do this same thing to many other non-medical disease treatments. They
have decided that they know best for humanity and that you and everyone else
don’t deserve to know what is out there. Or they can afford to do it because the
pharmaceutical companies pay their salary and of course that is the most likely
scenario.
Should I apologize for calling them psychopaths? There doesn't seem to be a nice
word for them. If they were just doing this out of ignorance, I would find a
nicer name, but
paid or not, they do it out of malice and they are hurting people.
So let me explain what they have done concerning MMS. There isn’t room to repeat
what they have written word for word, but I’ll give you an idea. If you want to
read it, and I hope you will, you can go to Wikipedia and search the site for
"Miracle Mineral Supplement".With that title for their article, they start off
on the wrong foot -- that is not the correct name of MMS. It should say, "Master
Mineral Solution".
Two Blatant Mistakes
Because they don't understand chemistry, those Wikipedia writers make 2 big
mistakes.
Mistake #1
In the very first sentence, they say sodium chlorite is a toxic chemical. But
the EPA does not consider sodium chlorite to be a toxic chemical. Further, the
FDA has long approved it for use on food and in water purification and why would
they authorize a toxic chemical to be used on food? Here is the reference:
21
C.F.R. 173.325 Acidified Sodium Chlorite solutions
You can put this into Google or any search engine. Most of the food you eat is
treated with sodium chlorite before it arrives at your supermarket.
Mistake #2
They do not realize that people
who use MMS do
not ingest sodium chlorite. When
sodium chlorite is mixed with citric acid, the citric acid destroys the sodium
chlorite before it is taken into the body. This destruction of the chlorite is
visible. You cannot mistake what you are taking.
·
No one ingests sodium chlorite from taking MMS
I call this a "mistake" but when a person knows his writing is wrong it is
really a lie.
The Wikipedia References are Smoke and Mirrors
The Wikipedia writers list 21 references to prove their points. But their
references either prove my point or they prove nothing.
·
References 1 and 3 are
not available and thus prove nothing.
·
Reference 2 is
a scientific journal in French, but it only refers to chlorate, which is not a
part of MMS, so this reference proves nothing.
·
Reference 4 is
a clinical report of testing animal tolerance for sodium chlorite, chlorine
dioxide, and sodium chlorate. All data given proves my contention that MMS is OK
to take by mouth. Read
the report for yourself. Here it is:
www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en/document_library/maximum_residue_limits_-_report/2009/11/wc5000
It didn’t hurt any of those rats used in the tests to ingest amounts even
stronger than those used by people in real life.
·
Reference #5 is
a Health Canada report where they repeat everything said by the FDA. Neither the
FDA nor Health Canada cited any evidence or tests. When I called to ask if they
had followed up on the phone calls complaining about a stomach ache and low
blood pressure, they said that no, they had not investigated those complaints.
Then they mislead you by stating that MMS is a 28% sodium chlorite solution and
that it is a dangerous solution that can cause all kinds of terrible
damage. Well, yes, didn't we learn that in freshman high school chemistry: “Any
chemical in the world is poisonous in large amounts”?
The lie is that you take a 28% solution of chlorine dioxide when in fact you
take a 0.00004% solution. That is 700,000 time less than what they are trying to
confuse you into believing.
They want you to believe that MMS is 28% when ingested when it is actually
0.00004%. Why would they try to spread such a lie? Well, for every cancer
patient they can scare into not taking MMS, the cancer industry gains $800,000.
To learn about the MMS 0.00004% strength doses, please look at the instructions
for MMS on my Web Site jimhumble.biz,
under MMS
protocols.
Stomach Ache and Low Blood Pressure?
The
Wikipedia writers talk about reduced blood pressure, nausea and diarrhea
mentioned by the FDA and Health Canada. But these two agencies didn’t
investigate the complaints of low blood pressure or stomach ache and they have
never given any other evidence against MMS.
Fake References Again
The
Wikipedia writers' references again prove nothing.
·
Reference #14 merely
cites an article written by a 15-year-old boy who does not believe in a ‘cure
all’. So that reference doesn’t apply to MMS in any way.
·
Reference #15 is
just another announcement by the Food Standard Agency in Canada against using
MMS, but they offer no evidence.
·
Reference #16 again
alerts us to the terrible danger, but they offer no tests or chemical theory
or any other kind of data to back up their announcement. It’s just “Warning:
don’t take MMS.”
·
Reference #7 is
even dumber. It says MMS is a 28% mixture (it is not); then it says the mixture
of sodium chlorite and an acid produces chlorine dioxide (this is true); and
then it cleverly says, “Which is an industrial bleach.”
Well,
vinegar is an industrial acid, and salt has hundreds of industrial uses. In
doing their best to make MMS sound bad, they fail to mention that MMS, like salt
and vinegar, is used in mixtures thousands of times weaker than the industrial
applications.My reference again is my website jimhumble.biz. The
instructions prove the doses are very weak.
Moving Along in their Fakery
The
Wikipedia writers then make the statement that: “reliable scientific evidence”
supports only dangers from use of MMS. They say that any claims of benefit come
only from anecdotal reports and from Jim Humble’s book.
·
They
don’t mention that those anecdotal reports are in the hundreds of thousands.
Any
real scientist would know that this many anecdotal reports constitute valuable
evidence. And of course they offer no examples of their “reliable scientific
evidence.” There is, in fact, no “reliable scientific evidence” proving that MMS
is dangerous.
·
MMS
is only dangerous in large quantities and so is table salt and every other
chemical on Earth.
The
rest of the Wikipedia article seeks to mislead you in every line. They like to
throw in a few statements from some impressive-sounding authorities; e.g., that
according to the EPA, neurodevelopment and reproductive damage could result
from small doses of chlorine dioxide. They say “could” but offer no evidence
that MMS could cause such damage. That's because there isn't any evidence of
such damage ever happening.
·
Reference # 6 tells
of renal failure from extreme overdose, but fails to mention that there
was no death, and in the last 100 years, no death has ever been recorded that
shows renal failure from an overdose of chlorine dioxide.
That
particular overdose was not due to MMS. It was due to someone trying to commit
suicide by taking 10 grams of sodium chlorite, but the suicide was a failure.
·
Reference #9 is
an FDA letter sent to Jenine M. Cohoon of Provo, UT, warning her that she must
stop selling MMS and other herbs. No evidence is given that is relevant to the
data about MMS in Wikipedia. It is just a warning letter tossed in by the
Wikipedia writers to impress you, and as long as you don’t read it, it looks
like a legitimate reference.
·
Reference #21 links
to a study at Osha.gov. concerning chlorine dioxide and mostly rats. If you want
to take the time to read it, you will see that is shows MMS is very safe to
take. Keep in mind that the intensive MMS Protocol 1000 recommends 2 mg/kg per
day for a 70 kg (154 lbs.) man. That’s less than was given to the rats (per
their weight) and the rats were unaffected by it.
So as
I have already said, these references all either prove nothing or they prove my
contention that MMS is safe to take. Just remember, as with table salt, you can
take too much of it. But it is plenty safe in its recommended doses.
Note:
Just 2 gallons of water can kill a person. Dosage is the
key.
If
you want governmental proof that MMS is safe to take, go to: http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/healthguidelines/chlorinedioxide/recognition.html.
Of
course the government won’t refer to it, but there it is. I suppose they will be
removing it from the internet soon. It’s only used as a reference here because
the Wikipedia writers didn’t realize it proves my statement that MMS is
safe. They didn’t take time to read it, or they thought you would be confused.
There
is a lot more to tell about this Wikipedia MMS Article, as I have covered only
some of the lies. There is no room here in the newsletter but I am covering all
the lies on a website, as I feel that it will give you a better idea of how MMS
works and also a better idea of how the psychopaths lie. It will be on my site
“MMS world court,” available for viewing in about a week.
As
always with love,
Bishop
Jim Humble
أضيفت في:11-3-2011... فضيحة و نصيحة> فضائح "الطب" .... إذا وجدت أن الموضوع مفيد لك، أرجو منك دعم الموقع
|